Monday, November 14, 2005

oh puh-lease...

Hey...I'm seriously getting offended..right here and now. And you ought to read more carefully before leaping to conclusions because your incoherence is really getting to me. I cannot decide who and what your posts are targeting at...but right now it seems like you're going for me.

Now....what's with:

"We want equality but 1st the men must carry out handbags" shit?

You carry my bag so you think i am a lesser mortal? Fine. I'll carry my own freaking bag and take the goddamned bus if that helps to establish my independence. I would have thought my bf carried my bag because he loves me...but now I know better. He carries my bag because he thinks I am weak. What a letdown. So, all chivalrous men are really dead.

And he also thinks all females are out to rob men...which includes me since I too am a female. Just check out these lines:

"Did I mention the women’s charter as to robbing men of their hard earned money?"

"Although there are females in the society making stands and successfully obtaining their audiences, I also pleased to say that this is just a minority which has not caused extensive threats and dangers to an otherwise fair social standing system where the men have led since day one."

I don't give a shit about anybody's money except mine. Let me choose between a poor humble decent man, and a rich arrogant prick...I would ask to have the poor man, anytime. Why? I can earn my own keep...I don't need some asshole feeding me and giving me a hard time. There's a cost to everything...and the cost of being a kept woman is that she has no dignity. And just to reiterate, in case you are still confused, kept women form the minority.

And for your info, my dear boy, many of the men you chose to name were/are monsters -- "Hitler, Genghis khan, Napoleon, Martin Luther and even our very own honorable Mr. Lee." I really don't quite look up to them at all. With exception of maybe M.Luther King.

You choose your own path in life to walk and if you chose wrong, it is no one's fault but yours. You can also choose to allow certain people into your life. If you take the chance, you ought to be prepared to bear the consequences. Yet, to take out your past misgivings and anger on all womenkind is ridiculous and borders on the childish. I do not say this because I am a women. I say this because as a Man, I can see things clearly.

And as a Man, I am asking this of you now -- Be reasonable and you will get the respect you so desire.

XxX,

audrey at 22:49

7 lamb droppings




Well....

I have actually wanted to ignore the comments as posted but I felt hard done if I am not to contribute to the opinions as answered to my previous post.

There are a few things I have to sort out here considering the level of maturity and the amount of exposure most of the viewers here had and stood by.

For moments, I thought about the nursery, where kids roam happily, ignoring the troubles and repercussions that await them should they fall badly. The sad and good part here is that there is a “guardian” in the nursery to help pick the kid up, smothering and pampering him/her. Unlike to the contrary, this kind of operant conditioning only made the kid go out into the real world with elusive concepts, unbecoming, asking more and presuming everything is as the well the “teacher” said.

To say, there is a certain amount of truth out there. Kids must be taught and learned, that it is the society that proposes a certain outlook in any given situation. Although there could be unhappiness and unacceptances, this rule of power play is necessary because what happens if the society is ran by like-minded kids?

My muffin said:

1) Firstly, I’ll agree that love is conditional...women are especially practical in Singapore where everything is overpriced and most people are underpaid. However, i just cannot agree with the high-handed moralizing tone and sweeping statements that were employed in the post.

My answer:

Refer to the nursery segment. I represent the unjust and rude society greeting the kids once they “graduated”.

My Muffin said:

2) Second, it's a natural progression that if you have low expectations, your expectations will be more easily met. In saying this, by requesting that "women were more lenient [to men]", would it not be tantamount to saying that the standard of Singaporean men are low so Singaporean women should lower their expectations so they can find a partner??? I don't think Singaporean men suck. But I do think that Singaporeans in general are rather narrow-minded, petty and penny-pinching. I simply abhor the kiasu mentality.

My answer:

Like I have mentioned… Read the last paragraph before my address to my muffin. The general ruling in Singapore has made male Singaporean sit up and think about their futures. They never had been narrow- minded, petty or penny pinching to a certain extend. There is generally a concept of “harvesting” so as to cater to themselves shall the opposite sex decides to play dirty. Did I mention the women’s charter as to robbing men of their hard earned money? If women were that all capable, why not earn your own keep other than asking for compensations? Isn’t this also a kind of kiasu mentality? “I must have a share, I would lugi mah!” You would have from other alternatives and judging from the amount of male sufferers from the eluded “WC”, women are known not only to play dirty when the situation allows but also be really ruthless about it.

This is hilarious…let me put it this way…”I want to share the pie with the men, but I need the men to change my soiled diapers!”. My favourite quote of all times, “We want equality but 1st the men must carry out handbags.” ABSOLUTE JOKE. A woman never amuses me to act smart yet be stupid at the same time. This kind of pure entertainment is only obtainable from a certain group deprived species, which is the lesser gender, females.

My Muffin said:

3) The only reason why men don't want women to move forward is because they feel threatened. And you only will feel threatened if something instigates fear in you. So this brings us to the question of why men feel threatened. I guess the answer is obvious...they have finally (and only after thousands of years, and that's really slow if u ask me) come to the realisation that... women are not the dumb bitches they thought they were and are capable of much more apart from reproduction.

My answer:

Men have never felt more threatened than before, yes. For once I agree. But I am also glad to say there is always the magical word even wonderwoman would have trouble defeating. That word is: SUPPRESSION.

Although there are organisations accepting and taking in females. I am rather contended to be announcing that most female gender were only given a suppressive role in the society, in simpler meanings, a role in supporting the major successful workhorse, the males. Although there are females in the society making stands and successfully obtaining their audiences, I also pleased to say that this is just a minority which has not caused extensive threats and dangers to an otherwise fair social standing system where the men have led since day one.

There have been so many successful male leaders. I’ll name a few in hand: Hitler, Genghis khan, Napoleon, Martin Luther and even our very own honorable Mr. Lee. How would the world and society react if we were to put say, Oprah Whitney in charge? Generally PMS created decisions where I would think if given the chance, women will want to skin men for depriving them of opportunities for centuries. I have only 2 words to say, “TRY HARDER”.

There are certain differentiations as to dreams and reality.

Women dreamed to be in power and be on the same social path as the men. This is a dream. Men are still holding onto powers and what happens if a country is to be handed by a female? Think Philippines. This is the reality.

Women attributed men that they couldn’t compare and complete with them and have requested them to “stoop lower” so the men can reach them. This is a dream. Men nowadays have so many varieties to choose from and they aren’t afraid to show their worth. Singaporean Man to Singaporean Girl: “Although I know you are not the best among all here, I would appreciate you come down please. Okay, okay, you’re better, so please behaving like a kid”. This is the reality. Some men just want you to be natural and not be a brat, showing your million dollar puss** and proclaiming I deserved better? How would someone trear you fairly if you were to be in an aggressive stance firstly? Why blame the guy when something goes wrong? There are good guys too. This is reality.

Women have said the reason why men don't want women to move forward is because they feel threatened. And you only will feel threatened if something instigates fear in you. This is a dream. Men never wanted women to be left behind, in fact opportunities have been aplenty given but the only onus is the failure of the female gender to perform when on the public stage. Instead, views can be made this way, women feared men because they felt threatened because of the social and economical standing a male has and thus would further degenerate the female gender. Of course, sanctions and suppressions have to be made as females are capable of conjuring something so out of this world during days where it became “unreasonable” to dispute. Quote my muffin: You only feel threatened if something instigates fear in you.” The view is considered here rather as 2 way traffic and this is the reality.

To conclude, I have to agree with my muffin that the female gender is worth some time in the busy schedules of alpha males for consideration in regards to their active participation in all matters.

To sum up:

1) Women must try harder.
2) Women must learn how successful men have become and first take on an apprentice role. Learn the ropes and be ready in 100 years time.
3) Women must learn to generate equality as they proposed. The law has been fair to them considering their “Handicap”.
4) Women must not presume that all males are crooks. Male have been taught to survive in the harshest environments and they thrive in it (except for androgynous males or any other form of “Halflings”). That form of practice made men even stronger and it is these trainings that men are able to lead under no advantageous position.
5) Men meant well although sometimes expletives are used in situations.
6) That one fine day, men would want to kick back and enjoy their lives, preferring to designate and teach the female gender on their various skills and expertise.

7) That Men too, loved their women.

I personally give my utmost support to the female movement. You go! JIA YOU!!!!

The Masterpiece

XxX,

Mr_Mimosa at 14:48

0 lamb droppings




Saturday, November 12, 2005

my 2 cents

I think i am growing up. Tonight's clubbing session seems to have little or no bearing on me.

In fact, it seems rather tedious having to dress up.

Argh...what am i becoming??!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anyway, on a more serious level, here's my opinion on mimosa's last post.

Firstly, i'd agree that love is conditional...women are especially practical in Singapore where everything is overpriced and most people are underpaid. However, i just cannot agree with the high-handed moralizing tone and sweeping statements that were employed in the post.

Not all women measure love in terms of dollars and cents. I do, also agree, that many good men are not rich.

Second, it's a natural progression that if you have low expectations, your expectations will be more easily met. In saying this, by requesting that "women were more lenient [to men]", would it not be tantamount to saying that the standard of Singaporean men are low so Singaporean women should lower their expectations so they can find a partner??? I don't think Singaporean men suck. But I do think that Singaporeans in general are rather narrow-minded, petty and penny-pinching. I simply abhor the kiasu mentality.

I think the overall problem is that many Singapore men are stuck in the outrageously outdated thinking that women should be the caregivers, the meek, the loving, the dumb and stupid. And also that they should accept men exactly the way they are...including their philandering ways, being men.

C'mon, move with the times. Why should women be stuck in the same rut as they were a few thousand years back when there is the opportunity to move forward?

The only reason why men don't want women to move forward is because they feel threatened. And you only will feel threatened if something instigates fear in you. So this brings us to the question of why men feel threatened. I guess the answer is obvious...they have finally (and only after thousands of years, and that's really slow if u ask me) come to the realisation that... women are not the dumb bitches they thought they were and are capable of much more apart from reproduction.

XxX,

audrey at 15:51

2 lamb droppings




Thursday, November 10, 2005

RE: Love... Unconditional or Conditional? (Part 2)

The Masterpiece is here.

It's been awhile since there is an address to the peasants.

Pertaining to the above questions, I have to once again say, in Singapore, love is mostly conditional. This is such a sad cause because when women are busy whining about why the good guys are always missing, they had, in fact turned a blind eye to a certain minority... the good, industrious and wife loving guys (but with no materials possession ($)).

"Ohhh, I love *blah *blah, but I love my "Lousy Vagi**" bags (LV) more!!!! I want him as my soul mate but I prefer to hug with my lousy Vagin** bags".

times have changed. the current generation is different.

What irked me were the facts that Singaporean women kept blaming Singaporean men for the prostitution problems, citing that without the demand, the problem wouldn't exist.

Singaporean women should have looked deeper at the main factor driving the demand, (i.e. bitchy and demanding Sinkee feminazi women asking for the sun and the moon.)

Conditional:

I love you because of your looks/car/career prospects/money"

I love u because u love me.

unconditional:

* Only Singaporean women have the answers...

My bottom line?

No money no talk.

To be more precise, No money, No p*ssy!

It is of no surprises, that most men would rather pay for what they need from a women without the material and emotional baggage and it is heart warming to say that such paradises are ever extending in Singapore. ahhhh....

Quote a friend: "PRC Meimeis!! WO LAI YE!!"

Quote a married friend of mine:

Geylang's variety.
Batam's mistress.
Home's bitch..

So there you go ladies, don't go preaching when the going gets tough because you have brought all these problems yourself. Don't judge men by the amount of "Loser Buttocks" bags they could afford. That is not true love.

First off, learn to understand what a man wants and he will then give you his needs. I am no love doctor but I represent what the few good men want women to hear, that is to find true love if women were more lenient to them.

There, you're learning like a good B*t*h.. Go!


The Masterpiece
"Together we can exhume the Women's Charter!"

XxX,

Mr_Mimosa at 14:20

0 lamb droppings




Friday, November 04, 2005

my home sucks.

I just decided that I hate Singapore.

Yep. For someone with a very low boredom threshold, Singapore is just not the place to be.

It just hit me today how totally disgustingly boring Singapore is, now that I'm on "forced leave". Compulsory and forced are the same to me. I still don't get paid either way (fyi, im still on probation).

As I was saying, when the whole world is at work, there's nothing left for me to do by myself...except perhaps to watch a movie or do shopping on my own. But what's the fun in that? I already do that on weekends. Weekends are spent fighting the crowd at bugis or orchard, and perhaps making the odd trip to JB..to do more shopping. Bah. I'm starting to actually dislike shopping, strange as it may sound.

Sigh. Such a consumerist culture.

I need to be some place else. Where there's more things to do...like rock climbing..hotsprings..cycling by the beach without sweating like a smelly cow...being able to wear different kinds of clothes such as boots, hats and ear muffs.

I think having the seasons change would be interesting. I'm sure as the seasons change, there are different activities to be done. Like skiing in the winter...and diving into leaf piles during Autumn. Why, just anticipating the seasonal change seems fun.

I hate hate hate hate hate Singapore. I just cant stand the mundane..and the boredom. I'd rather die than be bored. *sob*

Someone tell me how to emigrate. I need to LEAVE.

XxX,

audrey at 12:00

3 lamb droppings