Wednesday, August 24, 2005

Is marriage a contract to legalised and permissible cohabitation?

First off, I have decided against calling myself god, good reason being I wouldn’t be considered as a deity and neither I would want to be associated with the dead.

From this very moment, I will thus be identified as THE MASTERPIECE.

Is marriage a contract to legalised and permissible cohabitation?

Now let us air our views on the above mentioned topic. I was rather amused but left interested by the message name left by one of my friend on his MSN messenger.

Now, this friend of mine is married for 3 years till date (to of course, a beautiful and understanding lady) and it is questionable as to doubt him on his views on marriage whereas he could be as uncertain as I am.

This is indeed cynical to hear from someone who made sure his wedding vows followed him till death, be that death till us part. This is perhaps of a series of fateful events, I shall conclude that has led him to how he is feeling and thinking now.

Monogamy, there was indeed a topic and comments not too long ago on this blog. Let me throw in my $1 million dollar worth. What are the expectations that women generally look for when they choose suitable men for marriages? It is ascertain that most men (although not all) would eventually choose not to abide the rule of having just one partner (sexual too), with the intention of seeking “readdress” outside and somewhere else. It is also definite (or rather) to say that, even though he could be reassuring to you physically; that you would have presumed his soul and mind to be too. This kind of conceptualisation would only be of significance in the eyes of the foolish.

As the monopolisation of Skinapour is seen advancing through the “effectual” Pappies, more so we are to witness for ourselves the collapse ultimately of the monogamy structure. As men and women get exposed to more and more western ethics, cultures and values, it is therefore to anticipate that the polygamy will be in due course, the solution to an immoral society which has yet to surface fully.

As I can concur, marriages were once intended to protect women. It has rather, progressed to the current phase to witness the growing affluences of women and that they might stand side by side with men, asking for equalities and stipulations. So may I ask, why are men excluded (and not given a charter too? We could get raped too!)?

If this is so, surely the practice of egalitarianism should therefore be acknowledged. Men could cheat, women would too (only being more careful). It would only be fair if our society practices fairness in all, but sad to say, with the pappies in control, only the elites would fly that plane together when the country experiences dire consequences (as a result of losing its own identity, Singapore? More like the next upcoming state for America; “Singamericana”).

So why is marriage a contract to legalised and permissible cohabitation? If you were to assume, when the practice of marriages would indefinitely involve deceive, “monopoly” but at the same time as women and men conveyed, the desire to hanker after “additional sustainability and reinforcement”; that if all fails, we sleep in a different room with another tonight.

This is ridiculous. I am for Monogamy. Why? I’ll tell you why next time. I love the person I am with concurrently so there is not a need to seek bearings with another. Why have noodles outside or bring them home when beef is cooked, ready and tasty at home.

Cheers

The Masterpiece

XxX,

Mr_Mimosa at 14:54

0 lamb droppings